Quick Links |
|
|
REPORTS OF ABUSE IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS &
public institutions
Abuse In Public Schools Article, May 2009
One Mother’s Story, One Child’s Misery
(please
contact
[email protected]
with ?’s)
In
April of 2001 the State of
Massachusetts enacted a much needed regulation ( 603 CMR 46) specific to
use of restraint in public and private approved special education
schools in Massachusetts At
the time there were many other regulations in MA regarding restraint
that pertain to nursing homes, hospitals, group homes but none for
public school programs.. All other agencies such as the , Department of
Mental Retardation, Department of Mental Health and those that pertained
to hospitals and nursing homes had regulations prohibiting restrained
used for anything but an emergency. .
THESE
new restraint regulations were a direct result of my showing a video of
my child being restrained a most abusive way to our state
representatives and senators. This video was presented to the
Massachusetts State Legislature by The Disability Law Center in Boston
to the Massachusetts legislatures and the MA Department of Education. I
also spoke at these meetings and at conferences while this video was
being shown. The video showed my child in a public school program that
was using potentially deadly restraints on my child for behavior
modification purposes rather than safety.
This video was taken of my child in a public school program for
children with autism and related disorders when she was age 10 years
old. In the video Abbie was forced to the floor face down very violently
for not sitting in her chair, not blowing her nose and not getting off
the floor when instructed to by the teacher. The teacher twisted her
wrist back to get her down on the floor on a dirty rug with her head up
against a wall and at times pulled her around the room like she was not
a living person. She only
hit and or pushed the teachers when they became physical with her but
was not being a danger to her or others.
Even if Abigail had been hitting the teachers or staff the type
of restraint they were using was extremely dangerous and could interfere
with breathing. We
felt that the type of forceful restraint technique as shown on the video
we felt rose to the level of assault and battery and that Abbie was
being abused. All the experts that we showed the video to felt that restraints
shown on the video were unjustified, unethical, excessive, improper, and
abusive. Abbie as shown in the video is placed in a prone physical
restraint position five separate times during a fifteen minute period,
all for repeated acts of non-compliance. She was restrained violently a
total of 15 times in a 40 minute time frame.. These procedures were not
restraint for safety but most were pain-compliance techniques, often used by police in the past in
correctional facilities. In
fact two crisis prevention companies (CPI and MANDT) and a restraint
death expert who is a EMT are using the still pictures from the video
and the video. These companies use the video and pictures to show the
most potentially deadly form of restraint (face down prone restraint
that can result in “positional asphyxia” and a painful wrist twist
to show an example of pain compliance).
In Feb of 1999 I gave a copy of this video which of my child
showing Barnstable school staff using these methods on Abbie for non
compliance to the Barnstable Police Detective Reed Hall. We were very
shocked when told that this was a “civil matter” by the police and
that the “case was closed”. It was not disclosed to me at the time
why the local District Attorney Michael O’ Keefe told me “it must be some kind of method they use on those kinds of kids “and
I had not seen any police report that they generated.
I
was very unhappy that our DA would have this have this type of
discriminatory attitude about a disabled child especially since the
video showed my child being abused by these aggressive potentially
deadly restraint methods that would never be allowed in any hospital,
nursing home or even prison in Massachusetts. I was very angry and that
is when I started working on the regulations and also consulted a
lawyer. We then filed a lawsuit (which was settled in July of 2004)
While in a deposition in August of 2003 some documents were shown to be
from the initial police investigation. I was shown a copy of letter
written by a nurse named Kathleen Ecker representing the Children’s
Cove addressed to DA Michael O’Keefe and a police Detective named Reed
Hall and for the first time saw the police report.
In
the summer of 2004 I finally obtained the whole file from the police
pertaining to this investigation. . The contents of the
letter written by Kathleen Ecker RN of the Children’s Cove and
what she says has led me to investigate the people involved in the
writing of this letter and the role the Children’s Cove played along
with a private school called The May Center or also known as the May
Institute. What I can see
from this letter is that the Children’s Cove Nurse that was asked to
look at the video for the DA and the Barnstable Police. They all seemed
to be unfamiliar with children with Autism and or developmental delays.
I am not sure why this was so since she was a pediatric nurse that
worked for years at the Cape Cod Hospital. Instead of just looking at
the goings on in the video and seeing Abbie as just another child of age
10 she decided that there must be different rules for a child like Abbie..
I wonder if a child with Autism has a broken leg or some medical problem
do nurses in hospitals think that they can treat them in some sort of
different manner. The two women that she mentions in the letter as it
turned out were not able to be impartial should since they were
connected closely to the teachers using the restraints on Abbie. In fact
one of the women was a consultant to the very program that this took
place in. I believe that the two women who were contacted by the nurse
were part of a scheme to cover up what happened to my child and protect
the teacher and the public school.
This past August of 2004 I then went to the Barnstable County office and spoke to the administrator who is in and hand delivered a letter to them about the involvement of The Children’s Cove. Every time I read the letter it was more shocking to me what was in it. I am actively in the process of investigating this incident fully and have reported the individuals involved with the nurse to their Boards of Licensure. I also filed a complaint against the nurse with the Board of Nursing which enabled me to obtain an affidavit and another version of this letter written by the nurse. I can see that after consulting with these two women from The May Center the nurse from the Children’s Cove with all her training at a hospital (where there are numerous safeguards in place regarding restraint) told the police and DA that she agreed with these two women that what was done to “Abbie was extremely therapeutic and that restraints were not contingent upon aggression alone”. The rest of the contents of the original letter I found as part of the police report and the one that was supplied to me by the Board of Nursing (which had even more information if you compare them) is WHY I have written to you at this time so you can see that your workshop needs to stress protection of children with developmental problems and communication problems in disorders such as AUTISM. From what I read about your workshop in the flyer you do appear to have an interest in the rights of disabled children I feel it is my duty to inform you what went on with my child and how she was treated by the Children’s Cove and the District Attorney. I wonder how this Children’s Cove Nurse with all her training could be talked into thinking that this was some sort of therapy and not abusive to Abbie and hurt her . Abbie came home many times covered with bruises and has been diagnosed with PTSD as a direct result of what occurred in that classroom when she was only 10 years old.
I am not happy with the Children’s Cove or the DA and the
police in how they handled the incident with my child. I am extremely
concerned about the actions of the May Institute Director and Social
Worker. In the future when the police are investigating abuse involving
a child with autism in the future this would not happen again. IF they
had obtained a video of a typical child being tossed around, sat upon,
pressed into a wall and having her wrist twisted (see the pictures) I
wonder if they would have been talked into the fact that this was some
sort of therapy to be used on children for non compliance.( you can see
from the two letters written by Nurse Eker )that the fact she was
restrained for non compliance was the subject of them ) I am enclosing
the letter and the two page police report and some other information. In
the course of your workshop you can relay to this agency and the people
attending the conference that children with autism and or other
disabilities cannot be abused by aversive type methods for behavior
modification and that tossing a child around and pressing her into the
ground is never “extremely therapeutic “as Nurse Ecker writes to the
DA and the police who somehow believed her and the two women from the
May Institute.
For
more information on this story visit:
http://www.aprais.org/
Trouble in Texas
by
Dr. & Mrs. S. McNutt
My Family's Nightmare in Texas |
||
Campaigns | ||
Teen Liberty Links | ||
Teen Liberty Agenda | ||
Teen Rights | ||
Program Watchlist | ||
Parenting Guide | ||
Parent Support Network | ||
Warning Signs | ||
Teen Liberty Lecture @ UW | ||
Harassment | ||
Importance of Acceptance | ||
Prison Reform Links | ||
Prison Reform Agenda | ||
Prison Penpals | ||
Support Inmate Artists! | ||
Human Rights Links | ||
Human Rights Agenda | ||
Environmental Links | ||
Environmental Agenda | ||
Animal Welfare Links | ||
Animal Welfare Agenda | ||
Search the HEAL Website (Search Includes External Links To Sites Not Affiliated with HEAL)
|